2018CTTI來源智庫發(fā)展報告 / 001

1中國特色新型智庫建設(shè)進展 / 001

1.1智庫政策文件制定點面俱到 / 001

1.2智庫體系和平臺建設(shè)日漸成熟 / 005

1.3智庫交流與傳播日益深化 / 009

1.4智庫研究與評價長足發(fā)展 / 012

1.5小結(jié) / 016

2“中國智庫索引”CTTI系統(tǒng)概述 / 017

2.1CTTI系統(tǒng)開發(fā)與建設(shè)進展回顧 / 017

2.2CTTI數(shù)據(jù)收錄情況概覽 / 025

2.3CTTI的作用與影響 / 029

3 2018年度CTTI來源智庫目錄增補 / 032

3.1 CTTI來源智庫增補原則 / 032

3.2 2018CTTI來源智庫增補過程 / 034

3.3天津來源智庫增補經(jīng)驗 / 036

3.4CTTI來源智庫數(shù)據(jù)分析 / 037

4MRPAI測評指標體系與排序規(guī)則 / 042

4.1評價基本原則 / 042

4.2MRPAI測評指標的確定 / 043

4.3MRPAI智庫測評指標的賦值 / 048

5 MRPAI排序規(guī)則 / 050

5.1MRPAI排序規(guī)則的設(shè)計原理 / 050

5.2MRPAI排序規(guī)則 / 051

5.3MRPAI智庫專家排序規(guī)則 / 052

5.4大學智庫指數(shù)排序規(guī)則 / 054

5.5MRPAI測評系統(tǒng) / 055

6來源智庫測評結(jié)果分析 / 056

6.1社會智庫測評數(shù)據(jù)示例 / 056

6.2各研究領(lǐng)域智庫測評數(shù)據(jù)示例 / 058

7加強中國特色新型智庫建設(shè)的幾點建議 / 074

7.1創(chuàng)新智庫體制機制，完善智庫治理 / 074

7.2改善智庫服務(wù)模式，提供嵌入式服務(wù) / 075

7.3優(yōu)化智庫人力資源布局，充實人才隊伍 / 076

7.4增強國際交流合作，讓世界理解中國 / 077

7.5樹立智庫品牌意識，打造旗艦產(chǎn)品 / 077

7.6促進智庫協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展，完善智庫體系 / 078

附錄：CTTI來源智庫目錄（2018—2019） / 080

2018 Annual Report on the Development of CTTI Source Think Tanks / 110

1Progress in the Construction of New Types of Think Tanks with Chinese Characteristics / 110

1.1Full Formulation for Think Tank Policies and Documents / 110

1.2The Think Tank System and Platform Becoming Mature / 118

1.3Deepening Communication and Dissemination of Think Tanks / 124

1.4Significant Progress in Think Tank Research and Evaluation / 131

1.5Conclusion / 138

2An Overview of the CTTI System / 139

2.1A Review of the Developing and Constructing Process of the CTTI System / 139

2.1.1Research and Development Background of the CTTI System / 139

2.2Overview of CTTI Data Inclusion / 150

2.3The Role and Impact of CTTI / 155

3Addition to Catalogue of CTTI�餾 Source Think Tanks in 2018 / 161

3.1Principles of Source Think Tank Addition / 161

3.2The Process of Adding Source Think Tanks in 2018 / 164

3.3Tianjin Source Think Tanks Addition Experience / 166

3.4Analysis of the CTTI Source Think Tank Data / 168

4The MRPAI Assessment Indicator System and Ranking Rule / 174

4.1Basic Principles of Evaluation / 174

4.2Selection of the MRPAI Assessment Indicators / 175

4.3Value Assignment for MRPAI Indicators / 183

5The MRPAI Ranking Rules / 187

5.1Principle for Designing MRPAI Ranking Rules / 187

5.2MRPAI Ranking Rules / 188

5.3MRPAI Think Tank Expert Ranking Rules / 190

5.4University Think Tank Index Ranking Rules / 193

5.5MRPAI Assessment System / 194

6The Analysis of MRPAI Assessment Result Data / 195

6.1Examples of Evaluation Data on Private Think Tanks / 196

6.2Examples of Evaluation Data on Think Tanks in Various Research Areas / 199

7 Suggestions on Strengthening the Construction of New Think Tanks with Chinese Characteristic/ 225

7.1Innovating the System and Mechanism of Think Tanks and Improving the Governance of Think Tanks / 225

7.2Improving Think Tank Service Model and Providing Embedded Service / 227

7.3Optimizing the Distribution of Human Resources in Think Tanks and Enriching the Talent Team / 228

7.4Enhancing International Exchange and Cooperation to Make the World

Understand China / 230

7.5Establishing Brand Awareness of Think Tanks and Building Flagship Products / 232

7.6Promoting the Coordinated Development and Improving the System of Think Tank / 233

Appendix: CTTI Source Think Tanks (20182019) / 235

2018 CTTI高校智庫暨百強榜報告 / 274

1高校系統(tǒng)高度重視新型智庫建設(shè) / 274

2高校在新型智庫建設(shè)中的獨特作用 / 275

2.1學科齊全，便于開展跨學科的問題導(dǎo)向研究 / 275

2.2人才富集，有利于開展大規(guī)模數(shù)據(jù)工程 / 275

2.3高校智庫有開展公共外交的便捷通道 / 276

2.4高校智庫輿論公信力較高 / 276

2.5高校智庫專業(yè)特征明顯 / 276

3高校智庫在新型智庫體系中占據(jù)了重要地位 / 276

3.1高校智庫的地域分布 / 277

3.2中國高校智庫類型及研究領(lǐng)域分布 / 278

3.3高校智庫的規(guī)模 / 278

3.4中國大學智庫指數(shù) / 278

4CTTI高校智庫百強評價愿景與原則 / 281

4.1CTTI高校智庫百強評價的界定 / 281

4.2CTTI高校智庫百強評價的目的 / 282

4.3CTTI高校智庫百強評價的原則 / 283

5CTTI高校智庫百強評價體系及算法 / 286

5.1CTTI高校智庫百強評價體系構(gòu)建 / 286

5.2CTTI高校智庫百強榜遴選過程 / 293

5.3CTTI高校智庫百強榜名單 / 293

6CTTI高校智庫百強榜數(shù)據(jù)分析 / 297

6.1CTTI百強高校智庫地域分布 / 297

6.2CTTI百強高校智庫大學分布 / 298

7高校新型智庫建設(shè)中的主要問題 / 300

7.1缺乏明確的政策咨詢信息，供求信息不對稱 / 300

7.2傳播意識淡薄，忽視宣傳工作 / 300

7.3智庫治理機制需要優(yōu)化 / 300

8加強高校新型智庫建設(shè)的幾點建議 / 302

附錄：CTTI高校智庫百強機構(gòu)小傳 / 306

2018 Annual Report on CTTI University Think Tanks & Top 100 University Think Tanks / 351

1Great Importance Attached to the Construction of New Types of University Think Tanks / 351

2The Unique Role Played by Universities in the Construction of New Types of Think Tanks / 353

2.1Comprehensive Disciplines Make It Easier to Conduct Interdisciplinary Problem�睴riented Researches / 353

2.2Abundant Talents Are Conducive to the Implementation of Large�睸cale Data Projects / 354

2.3University Think Tanks Provide an Easy Approach to Developing Public Diplomacy / 355

2.4University Think Tanks Have a High Level of Public Credibility / 355

2.5University Think Tanks Have Distinct Specialized Characteristics / 355

3The Important Role Played by University Think Tanks in the System of New Types of Think Tanks / 356

3.1Regional Distribution of University Think Tanks / 357

3.2Distribution of University Think Tanks in China by Type and by Area of Research / 358

3.3Scale of University Think Tanks / 359

3.4University Think Tank Index in China / 359

4Visions and Principles of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation / 363

4.1Definition of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation / 363

4.2Purpose of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation / 364

4.3Principles of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation / 366

5The CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation System and Algorithm / 370

5.1Establishment of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks Evaluation System / 370

5.2Selection Process of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 380

5.3The CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 381

6Data Analysis of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 386

6.1Regional Distribution of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 386

6.2Distribution of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks in Colleges or Universities / 388

7Major Problems in the Construction of New Types of University Think Tanks / 390

7.1Lack of Clear Information on Policy Consultation and Imbalance between Information Supply and Demand / 390

7.2Weak Awareness of Communication and Publicity / 391

7.3Management Mechanisms of Think Tanks Required to Be Improved / 391

8Suggestions on How to Improve the Construction of New Types of University Think Tanks / 394

Appendix: Brief Biographies of the CTTI Top 100 University Think Tanks / 400

2017“CTTI智庫最佳實踐獎”評選活動報告 / 474

前言 / 474

1智庫最佳實踐案例評選活動源起 / 474

1.1最佳實踐 / 474

1.2智庫最佳實踐 / 476

1.3中國智庫需要尋覓適合自身發(fā)展的“最佳實踐” / 478

1.4智庫最佳實踐案例評選活動的意義 / 480

2 CTTI-BPA最佳實踐案例評選回顧 / 481

2.1材料征集與審核 / 481

2.2評選過程回顧 / 481

2.3評選內(nèi)容分析 / 482

2.4評選結(jié)果 / 487

2.5會議回顧 / 490

3 CTTI-BPA最佳實踐案例擷英 / 493

3.1研究報告篇 / 493

3.2管理篇 / 496

3.3活動篇 / 497

結(jié)語 / 500

2017 Report on the Best Practice Awards for CTTI Think Tanks / 501

Preface / 501

1The Origin of Best Practice Awards for Think Tanks / 501

1.1Best Practice / 501

1.2Best Practice of Think Tanks / 504

1.3The Necessity of Chinese Think�睺ank Development to Seek Best Practice / 507

1.4Significance of BPA Selection for Think Tanks / 511

2Process Review of CTTI-BPA Cases Selection / 512

2.1Material Collection and Review / 512

2.2Selection Process Review / 513

2.3Analysis of the Selection / 514

2.4Selection Results / 522

2.5Conference Review / 527

3Best Practice Examples of CTTI�睟PA / 532

3.1Research report / 532

3.2Management / 537

3.3Events / 540

Conclusion / 545