定 價：45 元
叢書名：新聞學(xué)與傳播學(xué)經(jīng)典叢書·英文原版系列
- 作者：「美」約翰·杜威
- 出版時間：2016/3/1
- ISBN：9787565716539
- 出 版 社：中國傳媒大學(xué)出版社
- 中圖法分類：B023 B712.51
- 頁碼：316
- 紙張：膠版紙
- 版次：1
- 開本：32開
《追求確定性：知識與行為的關(guān)系研究》對知識行為的關(guān)系研究內(nèi)容主要包括以下十一部分：1.逃避危險；2.哲學(xué)對于常性的尋求；3.沖突；4.接受藝術(shù)與控制藝術(shù)；5.觀念在工作中；6.觀念的發(fā)揮；7.理智的所在；8.智力的歸化；9.方法至上；10.善的構(gòu)成；11.哥白尼式的革命。
國哲學(xué)家尤根.哈貝馬斯將杜威的《追求確定性》稱為杜威“最有影響的著作”并給予高度的評價。本書中杜威討論了作為架通認識與評價這兩個領(lǐng)域的中介環(huán)節(jié)的重要意義。杜威研究知與行的關(guān)系，強調(diào)知識具有實踐的意義，指出理論與實踐之間有著內(nèi)在的聯(lián)系，這種內(nèi)在聯(lián)系使得知識成為實現(xiàn)人類目的的工具和手段。書中敘述了傳統(tǒng)的區(qū)分知識與行動的方法對哲學(xué)概念的影響，說明了在自然科學(xué)結(jié)論和價值觀念之間進行協(xié)調(diào)的問題如何支配著各派哲學(xué)，闡明了科學(xué)本身就是一種有目的的實踐行動的方式，知識的確定是一個不斷追求的過程。
1．逃避危險
2．哲學(xué)對于常性的尋求
3．權(quán)威沖突
4．接受藝術(shù)與控制藝術(shù)
5．觀念在工作中
6．觀念的發(fā)揮
7．理智權(quán)威的所在
8．智力的歸化
9．方法至上
10．善的構(gòu)成
11．哥白尼式的革命
《追求確定性：知識與行為的關(guān)系研究》：
ions， combinations and separations.But the object bf direct or perceptible experience remains the same qualitative object，enjoyable and usable， it always was.Water as an object of science， as H2O with all the other scientific propositions which can be made about it， is not a rival for position in real being with the water we see and use.It is， because of experimental operations， an added instrumentality of multiplied controls and uses of the real things of everyday experience.
I am aware that this method of dealing with the great problem of modern philosophy will be regarded by many as too cavalier a disposition of a great issue； the solution if there be any （and many thinkers would perhaps feel any solution to be a real deprivation） is too simple and easy to be satisfactory.But I shall be content if the account leads anyone to reconsider the traditional beliefs which stand in the way of acceptance of the solution that is proposed.These preconceptions are the assumption that knowledge has a uniquely privileged position as a mode of access to reality in comparison with other modes of experience， and that as such it is superior to practical activity.Both of these ideas were formulated in a period when knowing was regarded as something which could be effected exclusively by means of the rational powers of mind.The development of scientific inquiry with its complete dependence upon experimentation has proved the profound error of the latter position.Is it not time to revise the philosophical conceptions which are founded on a belief now proved to be false？
……
書單推薦
