The Effects on Reading Proficiency for Junior Middle School Students——From the Perspective of Metaco
定 價(jià):25 元
- 作者:胡萍
- 出版時(shí)間:2017/1/1
- ISBN:9787564351595
- 出 版 社:西南交通大學(xué)出版社
- 中圖法分類:G633.412
- 頁(yè)碼:
- 紙張:膠版紙
- 版次:1
- 開本:16開
提高學(xué)生的閱讀水平一直都是外語(yǔ)教學(xué)的重點(diǎn)之一,元認(rèn)知監(jiān)控正是從心理方面入手引導(dǎo)和幫助閱讀者對(duì)閱讀過程進(jìn)行調(diào)整和控制,從而更好地培養(yǎng)學(xué)生閱讀能力。本書通過了解初中生英語(yǔ)閱讀情況及閱讀過程中元認(rèn)知監(jiān)控策略使用情況,采取以策略為基礎(chǔ)的外語(yǔ)教學(xué)的訓(xùn)練方法,對(duì)學(xué)生進(jìn)行閱讀理解元認(rèn)知監(jiān)控策略的訓(xùn)練,進(jìn)而揭示元認(rèn)知監(jiān)控策略與英語(yǔ)閱讀學(xué)習(xí)之間的關(guān)系,旨在為初中英語(yǔ)閱讀學(xué)習(xí)研究、元認(rèn)知監(jiān)控策略訓(xùn)練及外語(yǔ)教學(xué)提供重要依據(jù)和啟示。
胡萍,1974年出生,女,漢族,云南昭通學(xué)院外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院副教授,碩士,外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院教務(wù)科長(zhǎng),主要從事英語(yǔ)應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)的研究,主持和參加省級(jí)、校級(jí)課題研究多項(xiàng),現(xiàn)已發(fā)表論文二十余篇。
Chapter One Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 The Significance of the Study 3
Chapter Two Literature Review 5
2.1 Metacognition 5
2.1.1 The history of metacognition 5
2.1.2 Metacognition and learning 10
2.1.3 Scaffolded instruction 11
2.2 Reading 13
2.2.1 Defining reading 13
2.2.2 Models of reading 14
2.2.3 Defining reading strategy 15
2.2.4 The classification of reading strategies 16
2.2.5 Comprehensible input 19
2.3 Research on Metacognition Concerning ?Reading in China 20
2.4 Reciprocal Teaching 21
Chapter Three Methodology 26
3.1 Research Questions 26
3.2 Subjects 27
3.3 Instruments 28
3.3.1 Questionnaire 28
3.3.2 Experimental tests 29
3.4 Methods 30
3.5 Procedures 31
3.5.1 Taking pre-test 32
3.5.2 Instructions with two models 32
3.5.3 Taking post-test and filling in questionnaire 33
3.5.4 Data collection and analysis 33
Chapter Four Experimental Instruction 34
4.1 Instruction to the Controlled Group 35
4.2 Instruction to the Target Group 37
Chapter Five Data Analysis and Result 44
5.1 Analysis of the Pre-test and Discussion on the Results 44
5.1.1 Analysis of the pre-test 44
5.1.2 Discussion 45
5.2 Analysis of the Questionnaire and Discussion on the Results 46
5.2.1 Analysis of the general means of the two groups 47
5.2.2 Analysis of the means of each questionnaire item 48
5.2.3 Discussion 51
5.3 Analysis of the Post-test and Discussion on the Results 56
5.3.1 Analysis of the difference between the two groups in the post-test 56
5.3.2 Discussion 56
5.3.3 Analysis of the difference in some individual comprehension items between the two groups 58
5.3.4 Discussion 60
5.4 Pedagogical Implication 61
Chapter Six Conclusion 64
References 68
Appendix 1 73
Appendix 2 76
Appendix 3 78
Postscript 80